November 30, 2007

Kenya arrests 12 suspected Ethiopian rebels

Fri 30 Nov 2007

ISIOLO, Kenya, Nov 30 (Reuters) - Kenyan police said on Friday they had arrested 12 suspected Ethiopian rebels and nine locals accused of helping them in a remote region on the border with Ethiopia.

Two of the suspected members of the Oromo Liberation Front (OLF) rounded up this week have already been deported while the others are still being interrogated, said Rono Bunei, district police commander in the Kenyan border town of Moyale.

"The operation is still going on and we shall not allow any group to use our soil to fight a friendly government," he said. The rest will be deported if confirmed as OLF members.

One of several insurgent groups fighting Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi's government, the OLF seeks greater autonomy for ethnically Oromo areas of south Ethiopia.

The nine Kenyans were arrested for offering shelter to the 12, police said.

Some locals said innocent youths had been arrested.

"Most of the people arrested are Kenyans," local resident Barrack Mohammed told Reuters.

"We have lived with them and they can't do anything like that. The police are just picking on them." (Reporting by Noor Ali, Editing by Joseph Sudah and Robert Woodward)

Reuters

November 28, 2007

Soldiers continue human rights abuses in Ethiopia's beleaguered southeast, say residents

Associated Press

KEBRIDEHAR, Ethiopia: Ethiopian soldiers have abused civilians, committing arson and rape, in a southeastern area where they are fighting rebels, but there have been some improvements in aid delivery, residents said.

Ethiopia's prime minister, however, denies there is a humanitarian crisis in the Ogaden and his government has denied its soldiers have committed abuses. A top United Nations relief official who visited the region Tuesday said much more remains to be done.

A thin, pensive 30-year-old man, who asked not to be identified out of fear, told The Associated Press about two incidents on Friday in which the army burned two villages, Lebiga and Korelitsa, to the ground, killing one man.

The army, the man said, was killing his neighbors "like goats."

Officials in the area said they had heard similar reports. They also asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue.

The man also described rapes — some of them gang rapes — and public hangings in the region and said that villagers had been told not to speak to international observers. Officials in the area also said villagers had been told not to speak to outsiders, and that also was mentioned in a September report by a U.N. fact-finding mission.

Another man, 26, who also asked not to be identified for fear of reprisals, accused the government of withholding food in order to punish fighters and supporters of the Ogaden National Liberation Front, a separatist movement that in April attacked a Chinese-run oil exploration field in the region, killing 74 people. In May, the Ethiopian military began counterinsurgency operations, which has stymied trade and some food aid.

On Tuesday, the region appeared calm. Government soldiers dotted the flat, arid landscape and towns of Jijiga and Kebridehar, though there was no evidence of any significant military operations. Women — some wearing scarves of hot pink — fluttered through the streets. Men in Jijiga walked along the main promenade.

But when questioned, residents were reticent. One man in Kebridehar said he believed the streets were full of military intelligence officers.

In the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, Prime Minister Meles Zenawi dismissed a question in parliament about a pending crisis in the Ogaden.

"Whatever some international media and some organizations said about the Ogaden, it's absolutely a lie that there's a humanitarian crisis in the Ogaden," Meles told parliament on Tuesday. "Some people from the U.N. actually wanted to see for themselves what was going on in the Ogaden and I told them to go see from themselves what was actually there."

John Holmes, the U.N.'s humanitarian chief, on Wednesday described the humanitarian situation in the Ogaden as "potentially serious."

"I didn't get the impression that we are in a catastrophic situation now," Holmes told journalists, adding, however, "there's an awful lot of challenges still to address."

Those challenges included opening up transport and trade, expanding food distribution and addressing human rights concerns, he said.

Holmes said he discussed these issues Wednesday with top Ethiopian officials, including Meles.

About human rights, he said Meles, "responded seriously. He takes the issue seriously."

Holmes said he heard many secondhand reports of human rights abuses and said that "they come from numerous and sufficiently varied sources to be taken seriously." He did not give details.

In recent months, Ethiopia has expelled the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Dutch branch of Medecins Sans Frontieres from Ogaden. But in recent weeks the government has allowed 19 non-governmental organizations to return to work in the Ogaden.

The U.N. fact-finding mission said in September that the situation in the Ogaden had deteriorated rapidly and called for an independent investigation into the humanitarian issues there.

The mission also said that recent fighting in the region had led to a worsening humanitarian situation and a doubling of the price of food. It also called for a substantial increase in emergency food aid to the impoverished region where rebels have been fighting for increased autonomy for more than a decade.

Simon Mechale, director of the Ethiopian government's Disaster Preparedness and Prevention Agency, said on Tuesday that his talks with people in the region provided a more optimistic picture.

"From what I have seen so far, I did not see any amazing or disturbing thing," he said.

The Ogaden National Liberation Front is fighting to overthrow the government for what it says are human rights abuses and to establish greater autonomy in the region being heavily explored for oil and gas. The government accuses the rebels of being terrorists funded by its archenemy Eritrea.

Ethiopia 'bogged down' in Somalia


Ethiopian troops in Mogadishu
The Ethiopians are not popular in Somalia
Ethiopia's Prime Minister Meles Zenawi has acknowledged that his troops cannot withdraw from the conflict in Somalia.

Mr Meles said he had expected to withdraw his soldiers earlier in the year, after Islamists had been driven out of the Somali capital, Mogadishu.

But he said divisions within the Somali government had left it unable to replace the Ethiopians, while not enough peacekeepers had arrived.

Some 60% of Mogadishu residents have fled clashes in the city, the UN says.

The Ethiopians intervened a year ago to oust the Union of Islamic Courts, which had taken control of much of southern Somalia.

Their presence is unpopular in Mogadishu and earlier this month, insurgents dragged the bodies of Ethiopian troops through the city.

"Having done the main work, we had the belief and expectations that a situation would be created for us to be able to withdraw," Mr Meles told MPs.

"However, this belief and expectations could not be met according to our plan."

Talks

He has always said the Ethiopians would pull out when a peacekeeping force was deployed.

But only 1,600 Ugandans have arrived, from a planned 8,000-strong African Union force.

The UN is divided on plans for it take over the mission.

UN chief Ban Ki-moon says it is too dangerous to send troops to Mogadishu.

The UN refugee agency says one million people have fled their homes in Somalia, including 200,000 this month, following the latest clashes between insurgents and the Ethiopian-backed government.

Last week, new Somali Prime Minister Nur Adde said he wanted to hold talks with the opposition.

Somalia has not had a functioning national government since President Mohamed Siad Barre was overthrown in 1991.

BBC News

November 26, 2007

Appeal of Oromia Support Group in Australia regarding the safety of Oromo Refugees in Sudan

November 22, 2007

H. E. Ambassador
Embassy of the Republic of Sudan
3 Cleveland Row, St James
London SW1A 1DD
Telephone : 44(0) 20 7839 8080
Facsimile : 44 (0) 20 7839 7560

Dear Ambassador:

Foremost, we wish to express our appreciation to the people of the Republic of Sudan for their generosity and kindness towards thousands of Oromo refugees who have escaped severe government persecutions in Ethiopia and now living in Sudan. From under successive Ethiopian regimes –Haile Sellassie, Dergue and now TPLF - thousands of our compatriots have run away from arbitrary detentions, degrading tortures, violent killings in Ethiopia to seek refuge in relative peace of Sudan.

Oromia Support Group in Australia and, in fact, Oromos everywhere are alarmed by the report we received on the handing over of 15 Ethiopian refugees, the majority if not all of them were Oromo by the Sudanese authorities against their will to the Ethiopian regime. Most of these refugees were refugees who were legal resident in Sudan for a number of years and some carried UNCHR IDs. In July this year several Oromo refugees living in Khartoum and El Damazin were arrest and detained in Kobor prison in Khartoum. When Kobor prison became over crowded they were transferred to unknown destination to friends, most probably to the prison around Shendi. Around September 25, 2007, they were taken from their prison cells and transported to the border town of Metama and handed over in shackles to Ethiopian security and military forces on September 26, 2007. These facts have been documents by UNCHR in document in which they condemned the Sudanese authorities’ action.
The Sudanese authorities deported the Oromo refugees without going through the due process of law. The refugees were never taken to a court of law. Thus, the authorities have failed to respect their own constitution on this matter. The dreadful action of deportation taken by the Sudanese government constitutes violation of basic human rights and the fundamental principles of the 1951 UN’s Convention on refugees. Under the 1951 UN Refugee Convention, refoulement - or forcibly returning individuals to their country of origin where they could face persecution - is prohibited. Also, the Sudanese authorities broke Sudan’s longstanding tradition of providing protection to those who flee persecution and victimization.

Your Excellency,

The Oromia Support Group in Australia and Oromo living other parts of the Australia are disheartened by the Sudanese government action. By this action the lives of outstanding young men were put in a considerable danger. These individuals will face certain torture and death in the hands of the Ethiopian regime. We appeal to the Sudanese government and all human rights organizations to demand the Ethiopian government to safe the lives of these Oromo brothers and to set them free. We also appeal to the Sudanese authorities to assure Oromo refugees in Sudan, who are obviously frightened, that such action will not be repeated in the future.

Respectfully,
M. Qufi
Public Relation Officer
Oromia Support Group in Australia

Cc:
• UNHCR- Geneva and local Offices
• Amnesty International – London
• Human Rights Watch – New York
• Sudan Commission for Refugees
• Refugee Council of Australia
• UNHCR – Khartoum, Sudan Branch
• Oromo Community in Sudan
• Unrepresented Nations and People Organizations
• Sudan Commission for Refugees (SCOR)
Office of the Commissioner for Refugees,
PO Box 1929, Khartoum 780201, Sudan

November 25, 2007

DON'T LOOK AWAY - THE OROMO STRUGGLE


DON'T LOOK AWAY - THE OROMO STRUGGLE


SYNOPSIS

“..no speak! They threaten me with their boots, and the gun. They take away my voice, everything! No voice, then what do I have? You, Ferenji (foreigner), you have to send our message out to the world.”

This is the story of a chance encounter between Australian filmmaker Amanda Walsh and Mohammed Saieed, an Oromo man living in Ethiopia, and its explosive consequences. Through his powerful words, we will witness political corruption at its most extreme. While human rights groups scream out for assistance, the Ethiopian Government receives a constant flow of funds in the form of foreign aid, the US its largest donor.

DIRECTOR

Amanda Walsh

PRODUCER

Amanda Walsh
Brendan Guerin

LENGTH

CONTACT

www.documentaryaustralia.com.au

Gay and Meseret Defar are World Athletes of the Year

2007 World Athletes of the Year Tyson Gay and Meseret Defar (Getty Images)

Gay and Defar are World Athletes of the Year - Powell and Vlasic win Performance of the Year Award
Sunday 25 November 2007

Monte-Carlo – During the celebrations of the World Athletics Gala hosted by International Athletic Foundation (IAF) Honorary President HSH Prince Albert II of Monaco and IAF & IAAF President Lamine Diack in the Salle des Etoiles of the Sporting Club d’Eté Monte Carlo, 25-year-old American Tyson Gay and Ethiopia’s 23-year-old Meseret Defar were crowned as the male and female World Athletes of the Year.

A three-time World champion Tyson Gay, the 2007 Male World Athlete of the Year commented:

“To follow in Carl Lewis's footsteps (the first winner of the IAF Athlete of the Year) is just a great honour.

"I think for this year (winning the World Championships) makes me the fastest man in the world, but I honestly think that I need to have the World record like some of the other great sprinters like Carl Lewis, Maurice Greene. I think that sets you apart, having medals and having the world record."

Winner of all her races this season, including two World records and a World best, Meseret Defar, the 2007 Female World Athlete of the Year commented: “I don’t have words to describe how happy I am.

"This is very special for me. This is very special for Ethiopian women. Those who struggle very hard and who don't have very many opportunities to achieve the highest levels of athletics. So I dedicate this award to them."

The 2007 Performances of the Year award was presented to Asafa Powell for his World record breaking performance in Rieti and Blanka Vlasic for her 2.07m third all-time best clearance in Stockholm.

IAAF

November 22, 2007

The doves of war (The Economist)

The doves of war

Nov 22nd 2007 | DJIBOUTI AND NAIROBI
From The Economist print edition

Too many conflicts, too few decent armies to sort them out


THE United Nations will juggle nine separate peacekeeping operations across Africa in 2008, including the continent's two largest countries by area, Sudan and Congo. In addition, the African Union (AU) will partner the UN in a new hybrid peacekeeping mission in Sudan's Darfur region. It may also persevere with its own peacekeeping effort in Somalia and in smaller operations elsewhere, such as the Comoros. This sounds impressive. But the UN and the AU are both, in fact, struggling.

The Darfur mission, due to begin in January, is already looking like a lame duck; even 26,000 troops and police are probably too few to deal with the obstructive Sudanese army and fractious rebels in an area the size of France. Worse, the mission lacks basic equipment. The force commander, General Martin Agwai, a Nigerian, wants 40 transport and combat helicopters, all with military pilots. None has been forthcoming. That leaves him in a wretched position. The force can deploy now with virtually no helicopters and risk early humiliation (which would delight the Sudanese government) or it can be ridiculed for failing to deploy on time.

The AU mission to Somalia looks even more forlorn. Military experts reckoned that it would take at least 20,000 troops to impose order on central Somalia. The AU managed to get promises for 8,000. In fact, just 1,600 Ugandan troops have shown up. Somalia may now be sliding back into civil war, with the country's internationally recognised but feeble government and occupying Ethiopian troops on one side, and the Islamists on the other. Adan Hashi Ayro, a ruthless jihadist commander linked to al-Qaeda, recently issued a battle-cry for Islamists to attack the Ugandans in Mogadishu. A first assault was repelled; others are likely to follow. Though Nigeria's generals say they are ready to deploy a battalion in Mogadishu, it is unlikely to go, despite American urging. A larger but inexperienced Burundian force is also meant to be flown in but shows no sign of arriving.

Peacekeeping in Africa has come a long way since the Irish army was sent to Congo in 1960, in woolly sweaters and carrying Enfield rifles, to head off mineral-rich Katanga province's bid for independence. The trauma of that first UN effort, together with cold war politics, meant that UN peacekeepers did not return to Africa until the late 1980s. The UN failed twice in Somalia and horribly so in Rwanda, failing to prevent some 800,000 deaths.

But it has had some successes too: in Angola, Mozambique, Namibia and more recently in Liberia and Sierra Leone. The blue helmets have overseen elections in several African countries and plan to do so again in Côte d'Ivoire. They have also done a lot of de-mining and have helped disarm tens of thousands of fighters, including child soldiers. A new centre in Cameroon to train police for UN peacekeeping missions will open soon.

Yet if Africa is to begin to police itself, as everyone wants, its armies will have to become bigger and better. Some progress is being made. The British, with a military team in Kenya to serve central and eastern Africa, probably have the most detailed plan for improving African peacekeeping. Their commander, Colonel Andy Mason, a veteran of peacekeeping in Zimbabwe and Congo, says that Eastern Brigade, drawn from east African armies led by Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda and Rwanda, may start operating by 2012 at a cost over five years of $500m. It will be trained to be ready to send 6,000 troops to a trouble spot within 90 days. The Africans want rich countries to provide the aircraft to get them there, though judging by the UN in Darfur that may be wishful thinking.

America has much deeper pockets than Britain but many African governments are put off by its relentless talk about the “war on terror” and its attempts, often viewed as clumsy, to butter up disenchanted Muslims, for instance by getting American soldiers to dig their wells and vaccinate their cattle. But the Americans may be getting more dextrous. A new America military command for Africa, AFRICOM, may help streamline the administration's competing military, diplomatic and aid plans. The commander of the American base at Camp Lemonier in Djibouti, Rear Admiral James Hart, hopes his force will be brought under AFRICOM next year. He says his forces are co-operating well with the Ethiopian and Ugandan armies, both of which are meant to help America against Islamist fighters in Somalia.

The Americans also say that it is more important that they should work harmoniously with Africa's existing regional military bodies, particularly Eastern Brigade. The French agree—and are now working more closely with the Americans in Djibouti, where both Western countries have bases. This week a French naval frigate was praised by the UN's World Food Programme for escorting two freighters loaded with food aid through pirate-infested waters to Somalia. In Chad as well as in Djibouti, French forces are close to the peacekeepers' front line. In past years, their aircraft and special forces have protected French interests. Now the French say they are putting their emphasis on training African armies.

When it comes to weapons, African armies still look for the cheapest deal—wherever they can get it. This week China's defence minister met Kenya's president and promised a host of military goodies to boost Kenya's role as a peacekeeper. But where are those helicopters?

The Economist

Promises, promises (The Economist)

Promises, promises

Nov 22nd 2007
From The Economist print edition

It is time for both Africans and the rich world to walk the talk in Darfur and Somalia



SELDOM has east Africa seen such turmoil. Eastern Congo faces a humanitarian disaster; the killing in Sudan's Darfur region goes on apace; war rages between Islamist militias and Ethiopian troops in Somalia; and rebels threaten the government in Chad. On top of that, war may resume between Eritrea and Ethiopia and between Sudan's government and former rebels in the autonomous south (see article).

As a result, the UN is sending unprecedented numbers of troops to the region. It already has 17,000 in Congo and 20,000 more are due to join an existing 6,000-strong African Union (AU) force in Darfur. These are the largest UN forces in the world. Another 2,000-odd are sandwiched between the Eritreans and the Ethiopians, plus 10,000 in south Sudan. The AU also has some 1,600 Ugandan troops under its command in Somalia's blighted capital, Mogadishu.

We accepted the mission, now give us the tools

The numbers alone look impressive, as befits the world's much-vaunted determination to help end Africa's bloodiest conflicts. In Congo, the UN is doing its best to hold the ring between several rival ragtag armies. But elsewhere its fine intentions have yet to bear fruit, especially in the two most pressing cases, Darfur and Somalia.

In Darfur the UN is due to start deploying its forces in a few weeks. The speed with which several African governments have offered troops has been a welcome surprise, suggesting a new-found willingness to bear a bigger burden of peacekeeping on their own continent. But now the effort risks failing all over again because of a dire lack of helicopters, a prime cause of the peacekeeping failure to date. In a region as big as France with no proper roads, the static AU force has been easy prey for rebels and government proxies alike. That makes it imperative for the UN to provide both transport and attack helicopters for its expanded force. A score might be enough to begin with, but since the Africans cannot provide even this number the choppers (and pilots) will have to come from elsewhere.

The government in Sudan's capital, Khartoum, may jib at the prospect of West Europeans or Americans providing or flying aircraft over Darfur, so it would be good if Russia or India were to help out. But even if they don't, a robust and mobile force is vital if peace is to be restored to a region where some 300,000 people have already died and more than 2m are displaced. Plenty of well-armed men intend to make the UN/AU force's job hard, especially as there is still no peace agreement to be monitored on the ground, as the Security Council hoped there might be when it voted to send in troops in July.

In Somalia, however, it is the African countries that have failed to deliver. In February the AU promised a force of 8,000 to keep the peace in Mogadishu, after Ethiopia's invading forces, with tacit Western approval, clobbered the Islamist militias to bolster a shaky Somali government. But so far only the Ugandans, too few to do the job, have turned up. So the Islamists have regrouped and war threatens to engulf the city again, perhaps infecting the whole region. Africa and the West, not to mention the UN, seem to have lost hope and interest. African governments, whose forces in Darfur are being paid for by the West, should pay some of their own way in Somalia, albeit with more help from the rich world. But the main foreign governments involved in the painful task of negotiation—Britain, Italy, Norway and America—must not give up.

The Economist

November 21, 2007

The Ruination of Somalia

As the United Nations focuses attention on Somali, little is reported concerning the role the United States has played in the tragedy, as it continues to engage in semi-secret operations, using Ethiopian troops as surrogates, says Philippe Leymarie.


Guerrilla warfare has continued in Mogadishu, the Somali capital, since the fall in January of the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC), which controlled much of the centre and south of the country. The huge Bakara market in Mogadishu, known for its stalls selling arms and munitions, went up in flames in October after rebels attacked the defence ministry. Radio Shabelle, one of the few independent stations, was forced off air by the army, and its director, Bashir Nur Gedi, was assassinated on 19 October. Sheikh Muktar Robo Abu Mansur, the head of the underground Shabab (youth) movement, the radical wing of the Somali nationalists, has claimed: “Our mujahideen fought fiercely with the Ethiopian invaders and their Somali lackeys. The enemies of Allah responded with heavy artillery. The market was burned to the ground in their quest to destroy Islamic property in Somalia.”

According to the UN’s special envoy, the Mauritanian Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the humanitarian situation in Somalia is the worst in Africa. Many emigrants continue to flee towards Yemen across the Gulf of Aden. Some ten thousand made the crossing between this January and August, but 500 others are dead or missing. In September there were reports of boats adrift, filled with dead refugees; other refugees had been sprayed with acid by their “guides” and their bodies tossed into the sea. According to the UN High Commissioner for Refugees, others came under fire near the Yemeni coast.

Ethiopian forces entered Somalia in December 2006 to remove the UIC, which had held power for six months. And yet the Ethiopian foreign minister, Seyoum Mesfin, and Ali Mohamed Gedi, who has now announced his resignation as prime minister of Somalia’s transitional federal government (TFG, long based in Nairobi and then in Baidoa in Somalia), raised the Ethiopian flag over the new Ethiopian embassy in Mogadishu. The ceremony gave Gedi an opportunity to say: “Our country’s peace and stability has been endangered by a handful of extremists who claim to be religious, which runs counter to the principles of Islam as a religion of peace and tolerance."

The same day, the head of the Ethiopian mission in Somalia claimed that his troops were “an army of liberation, not an army of occupation." A few days earlier the Italian foreign minister, Patrizia Sentinelli, had come to a different conclusion after a meeting with the Somali president, Yusuf Abdullahi, who owes his position to Ethiopia’s tanks. The presence of Ethiopian troops was, Sentinelli said, unacceptable to the Somali people and they should leave as soon as African Union peace-keepers were fully deployed: 1,200 Ugandan soldiers have been on the ground since March, out of a projected force of 9,000.

Anti-Ethiopian feeling

Anti-Ethiopian feeling is strong in Mogadishu. Ethiopia and Somalia are ancient enemies: they went to war in 1964 and 1977-8, over a border dispute and the sovereignty of the Ogaden region, where the population is mainly Somali but which is governed by Ethiopia. To gain control of the capital this April after an offensive by the UIC militia, a movement “created by businessmen seeking a semblance of normality in a city controlled by warlords," Ethiopian artillery shelled districts believed to be most hostile, killing 1,700 people and provoking the exodus of hundreds of thousands.

Ethiopia’s recent intervention in Somalia was meant to dislodge the UIC, which refused to recognise the legitimacy of the transitional government established with support from the international community. In invading Somalia, Ethiopia benefited from considerable support from the United States, which has conducted war by proxy in Somalia. To the US, Somalia has long been synonymous with failure: under President Siad Barre (1969-91) Somalia initially allied itself with the Soviet Union and allowed its fleet to use the port of Berbera. Somalia later switched its allegiance to the US, but that didn’t stop the regime collapsing under pressure from a dozen regional independence movements. Thereafter Somalia slid into a state of chaos from which it has yet to re-emerge.

To protect a population that had suffered at the hands of feuding clan leaders turned warlords, a multinational operation called Restore Hope was set up in 1992 under US leadership. The UN took over the operation in 1993, absorbing the US contingent. But things went badly wrong when 18 US soldiers were killed in an ambush in the heart of Mogadishu. Their bodies were displayed like trophies and some were dragged through the streets. (These humiliating events were later dramatised in Ridley Scott’s 2001 film, Black Hawk Down, a big hit in Mogadishu’s video shops.) After these events, the United States avoided Somalia and refused to take part in any African operations or peacekeeping missions, even during the Rwandan genocide in 1994.

Change after 9/11

After 9/11 things changed: The whole of the Horn of Africa, especially Somalia, came under surveillance. From 2002 the US navy, aided by European navies, has patrolled the Somali and Yemeni coastlines and the Bab el-Mandeb Straits. Task Force 150’s brief is to secure one of the world’s most important seaways to ensure that shipping can reach the Suez Canal and the Mediterranean to the west, the Cape and the Americas to the south, and Asia and the Pacific to the east. The attacks in Aden harbour on the destroyer USS Cole in 2001 -- and on the French tanker Limburg the following year -- revived fears of a jihad at sea threatening oil supplies and commercial shipping.

The US navy routinely searches coasters and cargo ships with the aim of preventing members of the Taliban and mujahideen fleeing Afghanistan and Iraq from seeking refuge in the Horn of Africa. The border region of Ethiopia, Sudan and Somalia is one of the most notorious in Africa. It connects with the old caravan route to Chad, Libya, Mali, Algeria, and Mauritania on the Atlantic coast.

In 2002, the Pentagon established a special forces unit in Djibouti, a tiny state previously within France’s sphere of influence. With a force of 2,000, this is the only US base in Africa; located just a few kilometres from the Somali border, it also serves as a launch pad for covert missions, targeting suspected al-Qaida members in Yemen and Somalia.

Osama bin Laden is believed to have spent time in Somalia in the early 1990s. Some “Afghan” Arabs close to him were implicated in the 1993 attacks on US soldiers in Mogadishu. From 1991 to 1996 he lived in Sudan, where a military coup in 1989 and the establishment of a fundamentalist regime propped up by the National Islamic Front made it a safe haven. He invested in the al-Shifa pharmaceutical plant (which the US bombed in August 1998 in retaliation for attacks on Nairobi in Kenya and Dar es Salaam in Tanzania) and in the Al-Shamal Bank. He took on former Afghan Arabs, and began to recruit among the Egyptian faithful -- Ayman al-Zawahiri among them. The idea of a global jihad took shape, encouraged by his contacts with Islamists from around the world, but especially from Yemen and Algeria.

An initial wave of attacks against the US army and other US interests followed: Aden in 1992; Mogadishu in 1993; Riyadh in 1995; Khobar (Saudi Arabia) in 1996, the year in which Bin Laden left Sudan for Afghanistan, where he met Mullah Mohamed Omar, future leader of the Taliban. Bin Laden and al-Zawahiri next announced a “global jihad against the Jews and crusaders.” In August 1998, Bin Laden claimed responsibility for the attacks on the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, with 224 dead and over 4,500 injured.

US freezes assets

A few days after 9/11 President George Bush ordered the freezing of the assets of 27 groups and individuals believed to have links with international terrorism. Among them were Al-Barakat (the blessed), the biggest company in the remittance trade in Somalia (half a billion dollars are sent back each year by the Somali diaspora, providing a living for an estimated 800,000 people), and also the movement al-Ittihad al-Islami (Islamic Union), which is suspected of having taken part in attacks on US helicopters in Mogadishu in 1993 and of giving logistical support to the Mombasa attacks in November 2002.

Al-Ittihad was defeated in 1997 after an initial incursion by the Ethiopian army, but its leader, Sheikh Hassan Dahir Aweys, a former colonel who came to prominence during the Somali-Ethiopian war of 1977, turned up again in 2006 as president of the UIC. Aweys denies links with al-Qaida but admits to having had contact with Bin Laden when he lived in Sudan. He considered sharia law as “the only solution to Somalia’s problems” and confirmed he “shared the beliefs of those who see Islam as the target of a global war conducted by the US and its allies.”

At an opposition meeting in September held at Asmara in Eritrea, Aweys (who is on the US wanted list) described himself as “a nationalist fighting for a free, united Somalia, which the Americans regard as terrorism.” He has challenged Washington to prove his al-Qaida links, noting that US foreign policy is strangely bellicose towards Somalia.

Somali Islamists, suppressed under Siad Barre’s regime, increased their influence during the 1990s. They took control of Luuq, a small town in the south near the border with Kenya, which had expelled them. In 1996, however, they lost their stronghold in Puntland, a self-proclaimed state in northeast Somalia. Egyptian, Afghan and Chechen members of al-Ittihad began to leave the country as the “local Islamists gave up military activity in favour of doing business with the Gulf states, teaching in Koranic schools and defending sharia” and by 2000 the recently formed UIC was prepared to take part in a first attempt at transitional government.

But a 1995 UN report claimed that Aweys, who has his base in the Galgaduud region of central Somalia, was already receiving arms from Eritrea and was in touch with representatives of the National Liberation Fronts of both Ogaden and Oromo, which oppose the Ethiopian government. And in June 2006, Bin Laden and al-Zawahiri singled out Somalia and Darfur in western Sudan as places where the battle against the United States should be waged.

Bans on football and videos

US secret services have detected dangerous signs of “Talibanisation” in the traditionalist outlook of the UIC, such as bans on music, football, videos, and women working, and are keen to avoid the creation of a new Afghanistan in the region. They tried to buy some of the Somali warlords in February 2006. But the specially created Alliance for the Restoration of Peace and Counter-Terrorism was unable to check the advances of the Islamist militias, who had won overall control of Mogadishu by July.

This new setback was followed by a bold move: There would be no repeat of Black Hawk, nor any US forces deployed on the ground, at least officially. Instead, with a mandate from Washington, the Ethiopian army marched into Somalia to support the TFG, which had been unable to take possession of its capital. By December 2006, the Ethiopian forces had removed the Islamist militias from Mogadishu. In Baidoa (Somalia), where the TFG is still based, it is claimed that 20% of the prisoners taken during the campaign were foreigners, held to be clear proof of an international jihadist plot.

But once installed in Mogadishu by the Ethiopians, President Abdullahi had to abandon his plan to disarm the clans and the militias. Popular protests against the presence of the Ethiopian army grew more frequent. Attacks by the resistance resumed around the capital and by 20 March the city centre had fallen into the hands of the insurgents. On 30 March, the battle of Mogadishu began. In April, in an attempt to end it, Ethiopian artillery bombarded the insurgents. The rebel strongholds in the north of the capital fell, and within a few days refugees began to make their way home.

The US army’s hunt for real or supposed members of al-Qaida continued. In January 2007, it undertook its first major operation, the machine-gunning of a group of “fugitives” by a heavily armed C-130 Spectre gunship, first used in the Vietnam war. Operations such as these, unscrutinised, in semi-secrecy, mark the return of a robust US stance in the secret war in the Horn of Africa. In February, special forces carried out operations in the south of Somalia and on 2 June, a US navy warship fired on targets near the port of Bargal in Puntland, which, it was claimed, were hideouts for “fugitive members of al-Qaida” -- though these claims are unverified.

Raids against the jihadists have also increased in Mogadishu since the Ethiopians and President Abdullahi’s forces took control. Just being a former member of the UIC is sufficient grounds for being classified as a terrorist. Estimates of the number who have disappeared range from 200 to 1,000; they are believed to be being detained in the Villa Somalia in the port or in the National Security Agency’s underground cells. This augured ill for a reconciliation conference scheduled for June in Mogadishu. It opened a month late and lacked any participants from the Islamist groups and the Hawiye, the majority clan. It concluded on 30 August without any significant outcome.

Reopening old wounds

In entrusting the dirty work to Ethiopia, the United States has risked reigniting smouldering tensions in the region. In pushing towards an internationalisation of the Somali conflict, it has allowed the Ethiopian and Eritrean regimes, which fought an inconclusive war from 1998 to 2000, to reopen old wounds. Eritrea has little sympathy with the UIC, but has nonetheless provided it with arms: A UN report in November 2006, which warned of a generalised conflict, described an endemic flow of arms into both camps. It accused Eritrea of having made “at least 28 deliveries of arms, munitions and military equipment” (including surface-to-air missiles) to the Islamists, who then controlled Mogadishu after the conflict with the US-backed warlords.

Last September the Eritrean government, which Meles Zenawi, the Ethiopian president, has again accused of supporting Somali’s Islamist extremists, hosted a conference for opposition groups with the aim of creating a “new alliance for the liberation of Somalia”. This organisation’s first act was to call for the withdrawal of the Ethiopian army, which it considers a US pawn. It then launched a new offensive against Mogadishu in September.

Ethiopia has always supported the TFG. The US government secretly gave it the green light to make emergency arms purchases from North Korea, in violation of the sanctions imposed on Pyongyang by the Security Council -- at the request of the US. US foreign policy seems to have accepted that a regime as undemocratic as that of Zenawi -- which still has a monopoly on power thanks to the Tigre Liberation Front, which he leads, and which suppresses political parties, unions and student movements -- will profit from the war on terror in order to win financial aid and political credit.

In delegating the task of restoring law and order to Somalia’s enemy, the United States has also opened the possibility that Ethiopia will take part in Somalia’s dismemberment. (In the colonial era Somalia was divided: Present-day Somaliland was ruled by the British, while Mogadishu and the centre of the country was Italian, and Djibouti in the northwest was French.) Since the UIC has called for a holy war against the Christian regime in Addis Ababa, there is also a risk of encouraging a resurgence of Islamism cloaked as national resistance.

Washington’s policy has done nothing to stop the spread of anti-Americanism, as prevalent in Somalia as in the rest of the Islamic world. It increases the risk of indirectly relaunching the claims of the Ogadenis, Afars and Omoros, nations historically hostile to the centralising ambitions of Addis Ababa, which have long dreamt of the disintegration of the former empire. Africom, the new United States Africa Command launching in 2008, must consider all this if it wants to prevent the Horn of Africa catching fire as it did in the 1970s and 1980s.

[Translated by George Miller]

Philippe Leymarie is a journalist with Radio France International.

Le Monde diplomatique

Middle East Online

Eritrea accuses Ethiopia of having "declared war"

Eritrea accuses Ethiopia of having 'declared war'

Wed 21 Nov 2007

By Jack Kimball

ASMARA, Nov 21 (Reuters) - Eritrea said on Wednesday arch-foe Ethiopia had "long since declared war" on Asmara by refusing to implement a five-year-old border ruling marking their shared frontier.

Analysts and diplomats fear heightened tensions on the Horn of Africa rivals' frontier could erupt into a new conflict seven years after they fought a war that killed some 70,000 people.

"In undermining the values of international agreements and refusing to withdraw from sovereign Eritrean territories, the TPLF regime (Ethiopia) has already launched an aggression against the Eritrean people," said an article in the government-run Eritrea Profile newspaper.

"It is significant that the TPLF clique should now declare war or refrain from doing so, because the regime has long since declared war on Eritrea," the English-language biweekly newspaper said.

Ethiopia has insisted it has no plans to start a war, and says Eritrea is sponsoring insurgents in Ethiopia and also Somalia. Asmara denies those claims.

Asmara and Addis Ababa have been deadlocked over the 1000-km (620-mile) shared border since an independent boundary commission gave the town of Badme to Eritrea in a 2002 ruling.

Eritrea has accused Ethiopia of plotting to invade the Red Sea state at least four times in the last month -- a claim that Addis Ababa ridicules.

But diplomats and analysts fear conflict could break out after a late November deadline by the commission to set the border on maps and leave the two nations to physically mark it.

In September, the boundary commission brought the two sides together for talks to push forward measures to physically demarcate the border along the line established in 2002, but the talks made no progress.

The United Nations and the United States have urged both nations to show restraint even as an influential think tank warns that war could erupt within weeks if there is no major international push to stop it.

U.N. Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said in a report earlier this month that Ethiopia and Eritrea had moved more than 100,000 troops each close to the border.

The world body has a 1,700-strong peacekeeper force monitoring a security buffer zone on Eritrea's side of the frontier, which is supposed to be demilitarised. (Editing by Wangui Kanina)

Reuters

November 20, 2007

Separatist Rebels Accuse Ethiopia’s Military of Killing Civilians in Remote Region

Published: November 20, 2007

NAIROBI, Kenya, Nov. 19 — Separatist rebels fighting in the Ogaden region of Ethiopia accused the government on Monday of strafing nomads in recent days at a watering hole with helicopter gunships, killing up to a dozen civilians.

The government denied the claims of attacks, which would be a deepening of a conflict that until now has been confined largely to hit-and-run clashes between rebel soldiers and Ethiopian ground forces. But Western diplomats in Ethiopia said that the government had indeed used assault helicopters and that the war in the Ogaden was intensifying.

Abdirahman Mahdi, a spokesman for the Ogaden National Liberation Front, the leading rebel group in the area, said government helicopters attacked the nomads, who were noncombatants, near the village of Gurdumi several times since Thursday. Mr. Abdirahman, who is based in London, said he had spoken to field commanders who provided detailed information, including the names of several nomads killed next to their camels. He said the Ethiopians apparently attacked the watering hole because rebel soldiers had recently killed several government soldiers in an ambush nearby.

“The Ethiopians are turning to air power because they can’t face us on the ground,” Mr. Abdirahman said.

Col. Yasaf Adankegn, an Ethiopian military spokesman, said nothing could be further from the truth. “The O.N.L.F. has repeatedly misinformed the international community,” Colonel Yasaf said. “Nothing has been happening out there. There is no fighting. The rebels have been eradicated.”

These claims and counterclaims are similar to recent, conflicting reports by both sides, each claiming a string of victories. Last week, the government said it had killed 100 rebels. The rebels denied that, saying they had killed 700 government soldiers and allied militiamen.

A Western diplomat, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak for attribution, said the government had recently moved several attack helicopters to the Ogaden, a desolate corner of eastern Ethiopia.

“Unfortunately, these reports are credible,” the diplomat said. “But whether the government is using the gunships to track down rebels or for reprisals against villages, we don’t know.”

The government recently expelled several aid organizations from the Ogaden, including the International Committee of the Red Cross. It accused Red Cross workers of being rebel spies. But earlier this month, the United Nations announced that it had worked out an agreement with the government to open field offices in the Ogaden to deal with rising malnutrition rates and poor access to water.

New York Times

November 19, 2007

Ethiopia's Ogaden refugees recount horrors of conflict

Andrew Cawthorne | Dadaab, Kenya
19 November 2007

It was after the second beating by Ethiopian soldiers that Abdi Bashi Jama says he decided to head for the border.

But though separated from family, far from his home village in Ethiopia's eastern Ogaden region, and a refugee rather than a shop-owner now, Jama considers himself lucky.

"The last time they attacked the village, they collected many men and took them away," he said, pausing in the early afternoon heat of a refugee camp in north-east Kenya.

"Some guys were hung on trees, nooses round their necks until they died ... I saw it."

Similar harrowing testimony -- dismissed as rebel propaganda by the Ethiopian government -- was repeated by various Ogaden refugees who have trickled recently into different parts of Kenya's massive Dadaab camps, home to 170 000 refugees.

In separate interviews, the Ogadenis claimed Ethiopian soldiers had been entering villages over-and-over again to kill, rape and burn in a campaign to flush out rebels of the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF).

Stories of shooting, hanging, beating and rape abound.

"My village was attacked more than 10 times. There is a great genocide going on. Why does the international community not intervene?" added Jama, standing among a crowd of refugees near their threadbare shelters of branches and plastic.

There is, in fact, growing international concern over the Ogaden crisis since the Ethiopian military this year launched an unprecedented offensive against the separatist insurgents.

That followed the separatist rebels' most dramatic attack to date, on an oil-field in April, that killed 74 people.

Annoyed at the foreign pressure it has been feeling over Ogaden, Ethiopian government officials say tales of massive rights abuses by its soldiers are a smokescreen to hide atrocities by the rebels against the population.

They say the ONLF is a terrorist group backed by Ethiopia's arch-enemy Eritrea and linked to Muslim extremists in Somalia.

Whatever the truth, the Ogaden crisis has become yet another factor -- adding to the Somalia conflict, and the Ethiopia-Eritrea border dispute -- destabilising the Horn of Africa, one of the world's poorest and most war-prone regions.

Dreams of freedom
The effect of the Ogaden crisis is being felt in neighbouring Kenya, where more Ogadenis than usual have been trickling into the three Dadaab camps, although the vast majority of refugees are still those fleeing the Somalia war.

"We have been noticing more from Ogaden, especially in the past two months," said Amy Wordley, external relations officer in Dadaab for the world body's refugee agency UNHCR.

"They just say the fighting has brought them here, and speak of travelling for about three weeks."

Osman Omar Abdi's journey from the Ogaden district of Jarar began in May after, he says, his wife was shot dead in front of him, his six children scattered, and his house burned during a chaotic morning raid by foot-soldiers.

"The Ethiopians say that all the Ogaden people are part and parcel of the ONLF, they don't differentiate, so they kill everyone," he said, displaying a scar on his hand that he described as a bullet-wound.

"I heard the grandparents got three of my children. I don't know about the others," added Abdi, revealing at the end of an interview that he had been a "member of the ONLF resistance."

Another Ogadeni in Dadaab, Yusuf Hashi Ahmed, said he fled his home village in Bali district during an army attack at the end of 2006, leaving his family behind.

The former pastoralist farmer crossed into Somalia and reached the southern city of Kismayu, only to flee again when Ethiopian troops advanced on Islamist fighters there during the ousting of Somalia's Islamic Courts Union over the New Year.

"Here, I have peace. But I have lost everything else," he said, squatting under a thornbush. "The army were given the wrong information, that the ONLF was in my village. Some were killed, others were injured. I had to flee, I was frightened."

As ethnic Somalis, the Ogadenis blend unobtrusively into Somalia and north Kenya, which is almost entirely populated by Somali people. They also cross porous borders easily, making a mockery of the supposed closure of the Kenya-Somalia border.

"What we dream of is democracy and the freedom of Ogaden," added Ahmed. "We can survive on our own. We have resources -- our oil. That is why Ethiopia fights us."

Reuters

ETHIOPIA: Dying Regime with Curious Supporters

Sophia Tesfamariam

Ethiopia: Dying regime with curious supporters

I borrowed the title from Donald E. B Jameson’s 1990’s article in the Washington Times in which he questioned the prudence of the Israeli and Soviet Union’s support for the regime in Ethiopia, led by Menghistu Hailemariam, while fully cognizant of its imminent collapse. Much of what Jameson, a retired Central Intelligence Agency officer, a writer and a consultant on international affairs, wrote about the nature of the Menghistu regime and the unconditional support given to it by the Soviet Union and Israel, can today be said about Meles Zenawi’s minority Tigrayan regime ruling Ethiopia and the diplomatic, financial, political and military support it receives from the US Administration and its allies.

The US Administration, through its representatives at the State Department, and most vocally through Jendayi E. Frazer, the Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, has gone out of its way to publicly and aggressively defend and protect the minority regime in Ethiopia, as it violates international law, rejects the Final and Binding decision of the Eritrea Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC), refuses to allow for the unconditional demarcation of the Eritrea Ethiopia border, invades and occupies sovereign territories of neighboring states, violates the human rights of the Ethiopian and Somali peoples, commits genocides, rapes and untold international crimes against humanity, tortures political detainees and employing Menghistu’s scorched earth policies, uses food as a weapon of war against the people of Ethiopia.

Allow me to share Jameson’s observations and comments on the Menghistu regime and its key supporters. On 3 April 1990, about a year before Menghistu’s ouster from Ethiopia, Jameson wrote the following:

-“ …Colonel Menghistu, leader of Ethiopia’s dying communist regime has finally issued a decree proclaiming a new era of enlightenment and reform for his tortured starving nation. Included were private enterprise, tolerance of dissent, opportunities for foreign investors and all the slogans of reformation sweeping Eastern Europe…His people are dying of hunger imposed by his government. His armies are disintegrating, and only the support of his foreign friends prolongs the agony of the long-suffering people of Ethiopia…”

-“…And his friends are a curious combination. Mikhail Gorbachev’s Soviet Union sent over $800 million worth of arms to Ethiopia last year…So Mr. Gorbachev, who supported the overthrow of Nicolae Ceausescu in Romania, still furnished the weapons to the dwindling guardians of a despot whose misdeeds equal, if not exceed in depravity, those of Romania’s recently executed president-for-life…”

-“…What makes the situation even more curious is that, at first glance, it is hard to see why anybody would support Col. Mengistu. Leave humanitarian considerations aside and look at it in terms of realpolitik…Ethiopia’s armies melt away from desertion and surrender almost as rapidly as the reminaing youth of the nation can be pressed into the ranks…”

-“…The weapons that the foreign powers ship to Col. Mengistu flow through the hands of his soldiers and on to the Eritrean People’s Liberation Front (EPLF), the Tigreans and other rebel forces…”

-“…Mr. Gorbachev can plead inertia as an excuse for keeping on with this tragic folly. The Soviets have been trying to make Col. Mengistu a viable autocrat for 15 years…It may be hard to change course after all that time…Israeli advisers are trying to shape up Col. Mengistu’s armies…nevertheless, neither inertia in the case of the Soviets, nor the well being of the Jewish colony in Ethiopia explain fully the support Col. Mengistu receives…”

-“…For both the Soviet Union and Israel, Ethiopia is primarily a littoral state on the Red Sea. For the Soviets it is also a foothold in Africa, a place from which influence and power can be projected down into Kenya or westward across the countries south of the Magreb…”

-“…As the Eritrean and Tigrean resistance expand their areas of control, the Soviets will finally learn that despite Ethiopia’s geopolitical value, the game is up…as astute political observers, they [Israelis] too must see the handwriting on the wall. But they also persist…The EPLF may soon capture Asmara. And then what happens? Very likely, Col. Mengistu falls…”

-“…What are the Soviets and Israeli’s thinking when they contemplate that event? Almost certainly they are looking a head to find a successor; less bloody minded, more enlightened and more tolerant but someone who will be serviceable in keeping Eritrea a part of Ethiopia and pliable enough to try, when asked, to influence other African nations…”

-“…Can they [Soviet and Israel] place the strategic value of a place on the Red Sea Coast ahead of the starving millions who must have peace to survive? More practically, can they somehow tame the EPLF [Eritrean People’s Liberation Front] and get it to agree not to interfere with their concerns about the Red Sea? Therein lies the rub. The EPLF is the oldest continuously fighting guerrilla movement in the world. It has had very little help from anybody. Even forces as big as the Soviets and as adept as the Israeli’s should be cautious by now…”

-“…Eritrea, which has never really been a part of Ethiopia should get its independence. The option to revert to the autonomous status the United Nation’s intended for it after World War II I is no longer acceptable…that effort brought down the old emperor and it is now destroying Col. Mengistu…”

-“ …When policies have been followed for years, even the most experienced statesmen can fail to see that alternatives are in order. If Col. Menghistu’s curious supporters are firmly confronted by the rest of the world, then they may learn that the game is no longer worth the candle, particularly when the lives of so many innocent people depend on ending the conflict. Only peace with the EPLF can achieve that…”

Déjà vu?

Let us take a look at some of what is being said today, about the minority regime in Ethiopia led by Meles Zenawi:

-“…US continues to support Ethiopia, even though Ethiopia disregards both the border agreement which it signed in 2000, and the UN’s ceding of Badme to Eritrea in 2002…”

-“…So why didn't Ethiopia's allies - the European Union, Britain and the United States, who provide Ethiopia with millions of dollars' worth of development assistance each year and who are also providing substantial support to the TFG - do more to stop these violations? The answer is as depressing as it is obvious. Ethiopia and its Somali proxies, including a large number of warlords with notorious records of abuse from earlier conflicts, are perceived by the EU and US government as key allies in the "war on terror" and are doing the west's dirty work against Somalia's Islamists…”

-“…Ethiopia's military campaign [in the Ogaden region of Ethiopia] has triggered a serious humanitarian crisis… dozens of civilians have been killed in what appears to be a deliberate effort to mete out collective punishment against a civilian population suspected of sympathising with the rebels…”

-“…the state that is perpetrating abuses against its people in Ogaden is a key western ally and recipient of large amounts of western aid. Furthermore the crisis in Ogaden is linked to a military intervention by Ethiopia in Somalia that has been justified in terms of counter terrorism and is firmly supported by the United States and other western donors…”

-“…The EU and the United States have significant leverage over Ethiopia in the form of foreign aid and political influence. They should use it instead of turning a blind eye to abuses carried out by the Ethiopian security forces in the name of counter terrorism…Western support for Ethiopia's counter insurgency efforts in the Horn of Africa is not only morally wrong and riddled with double standards, it is also ineffective and counterproductive. It will lead to the escalation and regionalisation of the conflicts of the region and may well help to radicalise its large and young Muslim population…”

-"…Ethiopian troops are destroying villages and property, confiscating livestock and forcing civilians to relocate. Whatever the military strategy behind them, these abuses violate the laws of war…"

-"…Villages and nomadic homes have been torched by the Ethiopian forces. They want to starve the people into submission. Food donated by western taxpayers is being used as weapon of war by the Ethiopian regime…."

-“…The U.S. military used and uses Ethiopian air bases modernized by infusions of millions of dollars of “AID” funds to launch attacks against Somalia…U.S. spy satellites were used provide intelligence to Ethiopian troops as they swept across the Oganden basin and Somalia… The Ethiopian government retained former U.S. Republican house majority leader Dick Armey as a lobbyist in Washington to whitewash the Ethiopian regimes’ crimes…”

-“…The Ogaden, Oromo and Anuak regions of Ethiopia have seen massive military occupation and state repression. The Ethiopian government of Meles Zenawi has perpetrated mass starvation and scorched earth policy in the region. There has been very little international media coverage and most is favorable the Zenawi regime or pressing the upside-down stories about “relief” and “starvation” that serve the Western “humanitarian” business sector. The Ogaden basin is a bloodbath today. Applying the same legal standards as in Darfur, all three Ethiopian regions qualify as ongoing genocides against indigenous people…Failure to apply the genocide standards constitutes genocide denial…”

-“…the US congress and the Bush administration are still ready to reward Zinawi with half a billion dollars of US tax payers's money for a job well done in the US war against Islamic terror. This is nothing more than blood money paid to the Tigre army's mass, killing and maiming of the people of Somalia in the name of US war against terror while giving, lip-service to his atrocious human rights violations inside Ethiopia….The current US spin on the fear of Power vacuum in Somalia, if Ethiopia's occupation force is to pull out of Somalia, is a deprived lie designed to prolong the agony of the people of Somalia who are currently suffering under menacing power of the unholy trinity of US global militarism, thuggish warlords and the Tigre army…”

-“…No regime that terrorizes its citizens can be a reliable ally in the war on terror…Ethiopia's a great country. It deserves better, frankly, than the government they have..."

-Etc. etc.

I will end here and let the reader make his or her own conclusions…

The rule of law must prevail over the law of the jungle!

American Chronicle

TPLF’s Hidden Agenda: Mediation as a Tactic

TPLF’s Hidden Agenda: Mediation as a Tactic

By: Saafi Labafidhin

Every time they are under pressure, desperate Tigray People Liberation Front (TPLF) regime in Ethiopia claims their door is always open to negotiations. We have seen this in 2005 when there was real jeopardy to their fate. After the heat of upcoming elections reached Jigjiga, and the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) doubled its operations against the demoralised government military, they were forced to seek the help of Ogaden elders whom they refused to even talk to previously. These traditional elders were present in Addis since 2004 and met with Zenawi only after one of the leading Ethiopian newspapers, The Reporter, published Sultan Fowsi who was the leader of the elders on its front page. More than a decade before this, we have also witnessed the Qabridaharre Conference where Zenawi himself spent sleepless nights there to implement his ‘divide and rule policy.’

Time after time they tried to get rid of ONLF and its sympathisers. They call this organisation as ‘terrorists’. There has never been a year without a crackdown in this region and the bulk of the Ethiopian military find themselves trapped in an ongoing battle and consider this region the worst place to be. And things are never getting better for all of us. Despite all these atrocities, the current regime has always been on the loosing end of the battle against the Somali people, both at home and abroad.

Confused about how to create equilibrium for their conflicting policies, the TPLF is once again playing a game against the ONLF. They said they are going to negotiate with ONLF –the same organisation they called as terrorists. Nevertheless, this time they are using their new envoy Prof. Ephrem Isaac as a messenger. TPLF has always had a hidden agenda towards Ogaden. But this time their apparent objectives are as follows:

• a) To confuse the International Community
• b) to divert attention from their open-ended atrocities
• c) to kill the support of Ethiopian peace loving people for the ONLF
• d) and mainly, to divide ONLF leaders

The latest move by TPLF comes as crackdown of civilians continues and those who survived flee for their lives. A time when an Ethiopian army’s field commander claimed to have killed many ONLF fighters and captured many others alive. Lander which is a relatively stable village in the Haud has been a home for many fleeing Families. It is an open secret that for the army TPLF civilians and ONLF freedom fighters were of equal importance –they kill all. In the latest hours there has been reports from Dhagaxbuur that many villages around the famous Haro-Digeed valley have been carpet-bombed by helicopters positioned in Dhagaxbuur town.

Can Professor Ephrem Take fires between TPLF and ONLF?

Mediation is a process in which a third-party neutral assists in resolving a dispute between two or more other parties. It is a non-adversarial approach to conflict resolution. More interestingly, mediation has always been a part of Somali culture in the Ogaden as it is said u kala dabqaadid –literally meaning to take fires between warring parties as sign to mediate them. As a principle of mediation, a mediator must be neutral to the problem in question. Despite his position as a renowned professor in Harvard University, this gentleman lacks neutrality as he openly supported and continues to hail the criminal leaders of Addis Ababa regime and their flawed policies. He has gone to the extent to advocate the riddance of HR2003 in front of the United States Congress.

In addition, I doubt if the professor is acquainted with the long-standing trouble in the Ogaden and the realities on the ground; although I am sure he is aware of the brutality of TPLF against his own people: the Oromo. As an Ethiopian Jew who directs Institute of Semitic Studies in Princeton he can do better if he helps reconcile the Semitic language speakers, namely TPLF and CUD –Tigray and Amhara respectively. Or may be he can be successful if he settles the deep-rooted dispute between the Orthodox Church Synods, which of course, concerns him more than the Ogaden.

When it comes to Somali history and culture and how to negotiate them, Mr Zenawi knows better for he has been in Mogadishu (with Ogaden leaders) in 1980s for a long time!!! Instead of using all available opportunities Meles prefers to blame ONLF of reluctance and uses this as a pretext to press on with military operations in the region. On Oct 23 AFP quoted him as saying "We have spent years trying to convince the ONLF that negotiations were the only solution. We even sent elders abroad to meet them but they were reluctant," But wait a minute! We know ONLF have always sought a face to face dialogue in a neutral platform and you tell us this stuff while your forces continue to execute a campaign of terror against innocent people and more recently carpet-bombing villages and nomadic settlements in Haro-digeed. And Hey! Who arrested the leader of the elders you are talking about? ONLF or YOU? We know that you know we know!

Is TPLF really committed to end its wicked policies towards Ogaden?

Over 16 years have gone since the downfall of the Derg. Although the country is one the poorest performing nations according to UNCTAD's new edition of Trade and Development Index (TDI) (see here), much has changed for other regions where there are rebel movements, from Amharas Ethiopian People's Patriotic Front to Oromia’s OLF (Oromo Liberation Front), and Afar’s Afar Revolutionary Democratic Unity Front (ARDUF). However, the Ogaden (Somali Region), except for very few projects which are not intended to serve the local people (Jigjiga University is one of them); there has been a total neglect and collective punishment.

As a rational person longing to see peace and development in his/her land, I have always asked myself why Shinile is so under developed. Why pastoralists living in Negele Zone, Jigjiga and Afdheer are marginalized. Why are there daily Ethiopian Airline’s flights to Godey while there is no infrastructure and access to basic services –you may think I am naive but I at least know planes go there daily just to make sure that the Chat business is booming!! Why many other places where neither ONLF nor other rebel movements operate are neglected. There is only one logical fact: The SOMALI people anywhere they may be are isolated and collectively punished by the regime in power by reasons some of which are unknown to me. That is why we have a chip on our shoulders!!

The Addis Ababa regime has always ignored the price paid by their troops killed in the battles. After all, most of them are not Tigrayans. That means TPLF kills two birds with one stone. Fighting with the ONLF and making non-Tigrays busy by fighting someone else’s war.

During the 2005 election campaign, Prime Minister Zenawi, who has always been a wolf in ship’s clothing, boasted that as a guerrilla fighter, he was able to rule Ethiopia through the gun, and by it will he only be removed, according to him. Contrary to his claim, I would always expect ONLF or any other rebels to engage their matters peacefully. But it is unfortunate if the non-violent cannot protest peacefully. So TPLF acknowledged (at least to themselves) that by its crackdown alone, it is only walking into the lion’s den and that they cannot defeat ONLF in the battle field, they seem to have opted for other hypocritical ways to get rid of ONLF for good.

One such way is to pretend as if they were serious enough to negotiate with ONLF; they must have calculated the outcome of their cheap lip service when they chose to send Prof. Ephrem Isaac as a messenger. They have done this before in 1995 when the Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) split into two over negotiations with the TPLF. The “hawks” under the then ONLF leader Sheik Ibrahim Abdalla continued armed struggle, while the “doves” led by Bashir Abdi Hassan joined the EPRDF after merging with the Pro-TPLF Ethiopian Somali Democratic League (ESDL) of Abdulmejid Hussein. “TPLF succeeded in fragmenting the ONLF by engaging its more moderate members in negotiations and into the region’s patronage and spoils system (Tobias H. and Mohamud H, 2006) .

A word to the ONLF: Don't negotiate out of fear but don't fear to negotiate

To borrow a nice expression from John F. Kennedy who once said, "Don't negotiate out of fear but don't fear to negotiate” I would wish to see honest negotiations between the main actors in the Ogaden politics, namely ONLF and TPLF. I have already read a response from ONLF as I was in the middle of my writing. I appreciate the balance of your statement and how you always put your position clearly: “We have maintained that any such dialogue should be held in a neutral third country, in the presence of a neutral third party arbiter of international standing with no preconditions placed on either side” So I say to you: Please leave no stone unturned to unite your people and campaign the world to press Ethiopian government for a dialogue for a peaceful solution to the long suffering of the Somali people of Ogaden.

You have challenged them in the war front, but always remember in our modern time the pen is mightier than the sword. And above all, stay united!

Nazret.com

November 18, 2007

Ethiopian aircrafts 'carpet-bomb' Ogaden region: rebels

by Bogonko Bosire 1 hour, 29 minutes ago

NAIROBI (AFP) - Ethiopia's air force has been "carpet-bombing" villages and nomadic settlements in its oil- and gas-rich Ogaden region, leaving a trail of casualties, separatist rebels in the restive eastern area said Sunday.

"Since Friday the Ethiopian air force has carried out continuous air sorties on the area of the lakes called in Somali Haro Digeed," Ogaden National Liberation Front (ONLF) spokesman Abdirahman Mahdi said.

The air force "has been carpet-bombing the villages and nomadic settlements," an ONLF statement said.

"Many people are hurt or dead and lots of animals have been killed," he said, but did not say whether the fatalities were rebel fighters or civilians.

"The army decided to change tactics and use air assault because they realised their ground forces could not make it," he said, adding the air force was still pounding the region late Sunday.

"Some ONLF fighters were hurt in the air bombardments, but the air force targeted civilian settlements and livestock," the spokesman said, adding that locals were fleeing the region amid bad weather.

On Friday, the Ethiopian army said it had killed some 100 rebels and captured hundreds others in Ogaden, near the frontier with lawless Somalia, over the past month.

But Mahdi said army has an "habit of summarily executing civilians and then counting them as ONLF dead."

"The Ethiopian Army had killed hundreds of civilians are imprisoned thousands and we believe that this is a ruse to fool the UN mission who are starting to investigate the situation in the Ogaden."

The rebels say they have made military gains in the recent months.

In October, the UN announced that it had been allowed to collaborate with regional authorities to supply relief food, medicine, and veterinary services as well as setting up offices in a key town there.

Addis Ababa has expelled Doctors Without Borders and the International Committee for the Red Cross from Ogaden for allegedly meddling in politics, a charge both deny.

The rebel and army reports could not be independently verified as journalists and aid workers have repeatedly been blocked from accessing vast swathes of the volatile region in recent months.

The Ethiopian army launched a crackdown in the region after ONLF rebels attacked a Chinese oil venture in April that left 77 people dead.

Many refugees have since fled to Somalia, saying authorities have imposed a trade blockade, with few goods -- including food -- permitted into the area.

Human rights groups said the crackdown resulted in numerous human rights violations in the region and subsequent UN fact-finding mission called for an independent investigation.

Addis Ababa routinely rejects rights violation claims, saying its troops are pursuing "terrorists."

The barren Ogaden region has long been extremely poor, but the discovery of gas and oil has brought new hopes of wealth as well as new causes of conflict.

It is about the same size as Britain with a population of about four million.

Ethiopia accuses arch-foe Eritrea of supporting Ogaden separatists, which the authorities in Asmara have denied.

Formed in 1984, the ONLF is fighting for the independence of ethnic Somalis in Ogaden, whom they say have been marginalised by Addis Ababa.

Yahoo News

November 15, 2007

Ethiopia - Ethiopian-Americans in Oklahoma for H.R. 2003



ETHIOPIAN-AMERICANS and FRIENDS of ETHIOPIA in
OKLAHOMA For H.R. 2003


For Immediate Release
November 14, 2007

FIRST WEEK PEACEFUL PROTEST AT SENATOR INHOFE’ S OK CITY OFFICE SUCCESSFUL

Contact Person:
Mr. Muluneh Zeleke, Spokesperson
Phone: 405-314-4560

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK - On Tuesday, November 13, 2007, Ethiopian-Americans and Friends of Ethiopia in Oklahoma for H.R. 2003, held a successful peaceful demonstration in front of Senator James Inhofe's district office in Oklahoma City. Local TV stations and international media such as Associated Press covered the peaceful demonstration.

The purpose of the demonstration was to protest Senator James Inhofe's opposition to H.R.2003,
the "Ethiopia Democracy and Accountability Act of 2007" In a statement that Senator James Inhofe made on the Senate floor on October 17, 2007, he stated;

“… In Ethiopia, recently, I met with Prime Minister Meles, his wife. I met with members of the Parliament and with all the individuals there who are trying to do a good job. While there, I saw first hand their democratic progress and commitment in fighting terrorism….…..In spite of all these successes, in spite of what we have talked about and the significance of Ethiopia, I think we have to oppose H.R. 2003....This resolution's idea of encouraging and facilitating is to impose restrictions and ultimatums. These punitive actions could damage the bilateral relationship between the United States and the Government of Ethiopia, as well as derail progress Ethiopia has made in furtherance of democracy and supporting human rights.”
Senator Inhofe went on to say, "I hope when it comes to this side, if it does come in this form, that we will be able to resoundingly defeat it. I look forward to being in Ethiopia in about 3 weeks. I will certainly hope that I don't have to go over there after having something like this pass the Senate."

The senior Senator from the State of Oklahoma was referring to a visit in Addis Ababa with Prime Minster Meles Zenawi - that Parade Magazine identified as one of the Worlds Worst dictators.

A delegation representing the peaceful demonstrators presented a letter with backup documents that documented the recurring human rights abuses in Ethiopia to Senator Inhofe’s district office Director. The delegation comprised of Ethiopian-Americans, and native-born Americans underlined the importance of H.R.2003 in the struggle for human rights, freedom and the rule of law in Ethiopia. The delegation stressed that they were very concerned about Senator Inhofe’s continued opposition of the Human Rights bill.


The District Director stated that Senator James Inhofe did not, at this present time, put a "hold" on H.R.2003 and that Senator Inhofe as well as his staff will be doing further research on H.R.2003. The delegation requested that Senator Inhofe put out a statement stating that he did not put a "hold" on the bill and discussed thoroughly the reasons Senator Inhofe should support H.R.2003 when it came to the Senate Floor.

After exiting Senator Inhofe's office, the delegation reported to the crowd the result of the meeting; commitments were made from the energized crowd to continue to engage Senator James Inhofe to garner his full support in the passage of H.R.2003 from the U.S. Senate.

As promised, Senator James Inhofe put out a short statement later on in the afternoon confirming that he has not put a hold on H.R.2003 at this time. Senator Inhofe’s quote on not currently having a hold on the bill is as follows:

“I do not currently have a hold on the Ethiopia Democracy and Accountability Act of 2007 as it is still being considered in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and has not yet been reported in its final form.”

-U.S. Senator James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.)

In light of today's successful campaign towards Senator James Inhofe, Ethiopian-Americans and Friends of Ethiopia in Oklahoma for H.R. 2003 commit to continue engaging Senator Inhofe so that he will give his full support to the human rights bill. Ethiopian-Americans and Friends of Ethiopia in Oklahoma for H.R. 2003 urge all who have successfully supported the November 13 effort to continue to call, fax and e-mail Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) , Senator Trent Lott (R-MS) and Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) until Friday, November 16, 2007.

Ethiopian-Americans and Friends of Ethiopia in Oklahoma for H.R. 2003, thank everyone for the support that was given to the Oklahoma campaign, without the united action of everyone the effort would not have shown the success seen today.

****
Don’t Turn on Ethiopia
Published: November 15, 2007
Washington

NINE years ago, two nations began the first modern war in sub-Saharan Africa, leaving in two years more than 100,000 dead. Today Eritrea and Ethiopia could reignite their old border conflict. Arms and money from radicals throughout the Middle East, as well as troops trained in Eritrea, have strengthened an insurgency in Ogaden Province, in southeastern Ethiopia.

A new war in the Horn of Africa would destabilize the region and bolster radical Islam’s push to build a Muslim caliphate.

Sadly, Congress is poised to fuel the march toward war by passing a bill that threatens to cut off technical assistance to Ethiopia, one of our closest allies, if it does not, among other things, release political prisoners, ensure that the judiciary operates independently and permit the news media to operate freely. Ethiopia has already freed opposition leaders, reformed parliamentary rules to give opposition parties greater legislative responsibility and approved a new media law that meets international standards. By singling out Ethiopia for public embarrassment, the bill puts Congress unwittingly on the side of Islamic jihadists and insurgents.

A far better approach would be to buttress Ethiopia against threats to its survival — by helping it resolve its border conflict and ensuring that it reopens negotiations with insurgents and traditional leaders and permits international investigation of reported military abuses (including allegations of rape and murder). Ethiopia has begun this process by allowing the United Nations and humanitarian aid agencies to assist civilians in the Ogaden.

Eritrea demands that the border be marked exactly as determined five years ago. But this places some Muslim and Christian villages on what they consider to be the wrong side of the border, cuts through others and splices certain roads several times. The United States should press both governments to let people who live on the border help reach a mutual agreement on the final boundary.

Ethiopia is a nation where 77 million Orthodox Christians and Muslims live in peace, engaged in building a democracy while besieged from within and without by enemies of democracy. Congress should put aside its bill and instead use creative diplomacy to deal with the combined threat of insurgency and war.

Vicki Huddleston, a visiting fellow at the Brookings Institution, and Tibor Nagy, a vice provost at Texas Tech University, are former chiefs of mission at the American Embassy in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

The New York Times

November 14, 2007

Somalia: What the News Has Failed to Report

Ramzy Baroud, Aljazeera.net
Watch the video Report (Aljazeera TV)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=63E45ML6Ld4

The people of Somalia are enduring yet another round of suffering as Ethiopian forces wreck havoc in the capital, Mogadishu. Apparently in response to an attack on one of its units, and the dragging of a soldier’s mutilated body through the city’s streets, an Ethiopian mortar reportedly exploded in Mogadishu’s Bakara market on Nov. 9, killing eight civilians. A number of Somalis were also found dead the following day, some believed to have been rounded up by Ethiopian forces the night before.

Nearly 50 civilians have reportedly been killed and 100 wounded in the two-day fighting spree between fighters loyal to the Union of Islamic Courts and government forces and their Ethiopian allies. A report, issued by Human Rights Watch, chastised both Ethiopian troops and “insurgents” for the bloodletting. Peter Takirambudde, the watchdog’s Africa director, was quoted as saying, “The international community should condemn these attacks and hold combatants accountable for violations of humanitarian law — including mutilating captured combatants and executing detainees.”

Of course, one cannot realistically expect the international community to take on a constructive involvement in the conflict. Various members of this community have already played a most destructive role in Somalia’s 16-year-old civil war, which fragmented a nation that had long struggled to achieve a sense of sovereignty and national cohesion.

To dismiss the war in Somalia as yet another protracted conflict between warlords and insurgents would indeed be unjust because the country’s history has consistently been marred by colonial greed and unwarranted foreign interventions. These gave rise to various proxy governments, militias and local middlemen, working in the interests of those obsessed with the geopolitical importance of the Horn of Africa.

Colonial powers came to appreciate the strategic location of Somalia after the Berlin Conference, which initiated the “Scramble for Africa”. The arrival of Britain, France and Italy into Somali lands began in the late 19th century and quickly the area disintegrated into British Somaliland and Italian Somaliland. Both countries sought expand their control, enlisting locals to fight the very wars aimed at their own subjugation.

World War II brought immense devastation to the Somali people, who, out of desperation, coercion or promises of post-war independence, fought on behalf of the warring European powers. Somalia was mandated by the UN as an Italian protectorate in 1949 and achieved independence a decade later in 1960. However, the colonial powers never fully conceded their interests in the country and the Cold War actually invited new players to the scene, including the United States, the Soviet Union and Cuba.

One residue of the colonial legacy involved the Ogaden province of Somalia, which the British empire had granted to the Ethiopian government. The region became the stage of two major wars between Ethiopia and Somalia between 1964 and 1977. Many Somalis still regard Ethiopia as an occupying power and view the policies of Addis Ababa as a continuation of the country’s history of foreign intervention.

The civil war of 1991, largely a result of foreign intervention, clan and tribal loyalties, and lack of internal cohesion, further disfigured Somalia. As stranded civilians became deprived of aid, Somalia was hit by a devastating famine that yielded a humanitarian disaster. The famine served as a pretext for foreign intervention, this time as part of international “humanitarian” missions, starting in December 1992, which also included US troops. The endeavor came to a tragic end in October 1993, when more than 1,000 Somalis and 18 US troops were killed in Mogadishu. Following a hurried US withdrawal, the mainstream media rationalized that the West could not help those who refuse to help themselves; another disfiguration of the fact that the interest of the Somali people was hardly ever a concern for these colonial philanthropists. Since then, the importance of Somalia was relegated in international news media into just another mindless conflict, with no rational context and no end in sight. The truth, however, is that colonial interest in the Horn of Africa has never waned.

The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 provided an impetus for US involvement in the strategic region; only one month after the attacks, Paul Wolfowitz met with various power players in Ethiopia and Somalia, alleging that Al-Qaeda terrorists might be using Ras Kamboni and other Somali territories as escape routes. A year later, the US established the Combined Joint Task Force — Horn of Africa (CJTF-HOA) to “monitor” developments and to train local militaries in “counterterrorism”.

The US contingent was hardly neutral in the ongoing conflict. Reportedly, US troops were involved in aiding Ethiopian forces that entered Somalia in December 2006, citing efforts to track down Al-Qaeda suspects. The Ethiopian occupation was justified as a response to a call by Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government (TFG), whose legitimacy is questioned. TGF, seen largely as a pro-Ethiopian entity, had been rapidly losing its control over parts of Somalia to the Islamic Courts Union (ICU) which came to prominence in January 2006, taking over the capital and eventually bringing long-sought stability to much of the country. Their attempts engage the US and other Western powers in dialogue failed, however, as a US-backed Ethiopia moved into Somalia in December 2006. On Jan. 7, 2007, the US directly entered the conflict, launching airstrikes using AC-130 gunship. Civilian causalities were reported, but the US refused to accept responsibility for them.

The last intervention devastated the country’s chances of unity. It now stands divided between the transitional government, Ethiopia (both backed by the UN, the US and the African Union) and the Islamic courts (allegedly backed by Eritrea and some Gulf governments). Recently, the UN ruled out any chances for an international peacekeeping force, and the few African countries who promised troops are yet to deliver (with the exception of Uganda).

This situation leaves Somalia once more under the mercy of foreign powers and self-serving internal forces, foreshadowing yet more bloodshed. Our informed support is essential now because the Somali people have suffered enough. Their plight is urgent and it deserves a much deeper understanding, alongside immediate attention.

ArabNews